Byza31 Posté(e) 19 juin 2006 Posté(e) 19 juin 2006 J'ai eu le même texte que celo, avec la même lecture à faire. Suis trop épuisée pour avoir des impressions. Suis restée que 12 minutes avec le jury, mon exposé a duré un peu plus de 4 minutes. Mais tout le monde est sorti plus tôt apparemment. Un jury aurait même dit à une fille au début de l'épreuve de ne pas s'affoler s'ils avaient fini bien avant le temps réglementaire... Suis crevée...
ichibala_61 Posté(e) 19 juin 2006 Posté(e) 19 juin 2006 Dites, j'ai besoin d'une confirmation !! Ces temps de stress sont tres penibles, je me mets à douter de tout... Comme tout le monde je pense...L'heure indiquée sur la convoc, c'est bien l'heure à laquelle il faut se presenter ? Pas comme pour les écrits ou il fallait arriver un certain temps avant l'horaire indiqué ? OUI heure de convoc = heure à laquelle tu te présentes. Good luck ! On se croisera peut-être sans le savoir...
letapisrevant Posté(e) 19 juin 2006 Posté(e) 19 juin 2006 Dites, j'ai besoin d'une confirmation !! Ces temps de stress sont tres penibles, je me mets à douter de tout... Comme tout le monde je pense... L'heure indiquée sur la convoc, c'est bien l'heure à laquelle il faut se presenter ? Pas comme pour les écrits ou il fallait arriver un certain temps avant l'horaire indiqué ? OUI heure de convoc = heure à laquelle tu te présentes. Good luck ! On se croisera peut-être sans le savoir... Merci bien ! Vu ton horaire, je vais certainement sortir qd tu vas rentrer ! Je dois me presenter à 8h55... Tu veux le jury à point ou saignant ??? :P
ichibala_61 Posté(e) 19 juin 2006 Posté(e) 19 juin 2006 Dites, j'ai besoin d'une confirmation !! Ces temps de stress sont tres penibles, je me mets à douter de tout... Comme tout le monde je pense... L'heure indiquée sur la convoc, c'est bien l'heure à laquelle il faut se presenter ? Pas comme pour les écrits ou il fallait arriver un certain temps avant l'horaire indiqué ? OUI heure de convoc = heure à laquelle tu te présentes. Good luck ! On se croisera peut-être sans le savoir... Merci bien ! Vu ton horaire, je vais certainement sortir qd tu vas rentrer ! Je dois me presenter à 8h55... Tu veux le jury à point ou saignant ??? :P signe distinctif : T-shirt mango rouge....Ca me portera peut-être chance et si ça fait sourire le jury tant mieux ! Je pourrai toujours parler de mes amplettes en Espagne Jury à point merci !
Kezia Posté(e) 19 juin 2006 Posté(e) 19 juin 2006 Petite question à monsieur le syndicaliste : est-ce que cette façon de sortir les candidats avant la fin de l'épreuve est bien règlementaire ? Et NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOON je ne stresse pas !
hybris Posté(e) 19 juin 2006 Posté(e) 19 juin 2006 Kezia: je n'arrive pas à trouver dans le post des éléments pour comprendre ta question Peux-tu me faire un copier/coller pour que je puisse répondre :P Et le nom "monsieur le syndicaliste", ben cela me fait un coup de vieux Vous m'imaginez si vieux? :P
Kezia Posté(e) 19 juin 2006 Posté(e) 19 juin 2006 Bon, attend, je reprends, mais moins crispée Je me demandais si c'était bien légal de ne pas garder les candidats le temps règlementaire de l'épreuve. Est-ce que ça ne serait pas une raison valable pour faire appel ou un truc du genre ? Et "monsieur le syndicaliste"... Tu es bien "monsieur" ET "syndicaliste", donc je ne vois pas le soucis :P Je n'ai aucune idée de l'âge que tu as, mais bon, enseignant + petite fille = je-sais-pas-mais-certainement-bien-plus-vieux-que-moi :P
hybris Posté(e) 19 juin 2006 Posté(e) 19 juin 2006 héhéhéhéhéhé... c'est juste que souvent, dans la tête des jeunes collègues, les syndicalistes sont des rabougris, barbus et tout ce qui va avec :P Pour le temps de passage d'une épreuve, il sera très difficile de contester car peu de chose seront inscrites sur le PV de l'épreuve... c'est sûr que c'est étonnant de voir des jurys demander de quitter l'épreuve alors que certains ont encore des choses à dire...
tartiflete31 Posté(e) 20 juin 2006 Posté(e) 20 juin 2006 Hier aussi quand j'attendais de passer en Anglais, certains candidats ont dit qu'ils étaient restés à peine 5 minutes à l'entretien! Peut être que c'est parce que le jury avait une bonne impression et qu'ils n'avaient plus de questions à poser!! L'année dernière en musique les jury m'ont coupé en plein milieu de mon morceau de piano ( alors que j'en connaissais plusieurs mais inférieurs au temps demandé du coup pour le concours j'avais galérer à en trouver un qui durait au moins 3min!) Ils m'ont dit c'est très beau et on aurait bien aimé en écouter un peu plus mais par manque de temps on va vous libérer! Du coup je suis un peu restée sur ma fin! lol Mais je savais que la note allait être bonne. Alors que là en anglais je ne sais pas si ils fonctionnent pareil... Courage moi je suis en plein EPS pour demain. Tartiflete31
sosso82 Posté(e) 20 juin 2006 Posté(e) 20 juin 2006 Coucou!Ouf, l'anglais c'est fini!! Alors, je viens juste de rentrer,je vous fais part de mes impressions. j'etais convoquée à 13h20, et j'ai eu un texte sur l'election de Michelle Bachelet au Chili tiré dU Guardian (janvier 2006 je cois). C'etait assez facile à comprendre, mon jury était composé de 2 femmes qui m'ont posé des questions sur les differences de salaires homme/femme, sur les avantages d'avoir une femme au gouvernement en france... Par contre, comme d'autres, je ne suis restée qu'une douzaine de minutes et pourtant j'etait pas à court d'idées! Est-ce que c'est celui-là Hands off Bachelet 20 January 2006 06:27 South America’s great liberator from Spanish imperialism, Simon Bolivar, remarked almost two centuries ago that the United States seemed destined to inflict misery on the subcontinent in the name of liberty. How long will it be before the US “liberates” one of the growing tide of South American states to have elected left-wing leaders? This week Chile joined Venezuala, Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay and Bolivia in electing professed socialist and agnostic, Michelle Bachelet, as its president. In her victory speech Bachelet promised a government for all Chileans, which would close the country’s economic class divide by improving welfare and education. Her election was historic not just because she is left-leaning and, in a political culture notorious for its machismo, the first South American woman to rise to the presidency without clinging to her husband’s coat-tails. A medical doctor, Bachelet was detained and tortured by the regime of Augusto Pinochet, who seized power with the active connivance of then-US secretary of state Henry Kissinger and the CIA. What more graphic symbol could there be of America’s waning grip on its southern neighbour? In essence, there have been three drivers of US policy in South America: chauvinist arrogance; anti-communist paranoia; and the desire to protect the interests of American corporations. Indeed, the only real criterion for deciding whether a government is “democratic” appears to be its willingness to allow US businesses to operate unhindered. While the State Department accuses Venezuala’s elected socialist president, Hugo Chavez, of “systematically undermining democratic institutions”, it raised not a breath of protest during nearly 20 years of brutal human rights abuse under Pinochet’s tyranny. Because they have been elected -- Chavez by two-thirds of Venezualans -- and have not outlawed opposition, the new leaders are a more elusive target than the revolutionaries of Fidel Castro’s generation. But there are already warning signs. The call by right-wing evangelist Pat Robertson for Chavez to be “taken out” would be taken, in any normal country, as evidence that one can be deeply religious and a vicious putz at one and the same time. But the Christian right is the soul of the Bush administration, and Robertson’s call is a straw in the wind. Leaked Pentagon documents have identified Venezuala as a “post-Iraq” threat, while The Washington Post has reported on CIA plans to assassinate Chavez. The State Department’s scene-setting propaganda efforts include a claim that Venezuala is playing host to Basque terrorists -- an allegation rejected by the Spanish government. Democracy is supposed to be about the exercise of individual choice. When will Americans grasp the simple truth that people beyond its borders have a right to choose their own leaders and systems of rule? A conditional B+ It is too early to start handing out report cards glittering with distinctions, but initial accounts of this year’s back-to-school experiences across the country suggest a remarkable turnaround has occurred. The reopening of schools every January has in the past been plagued by scenes of varying degrees of chaos, invariably affecting poorer schools and communities more than others. We have become used to the usual parade of problems -- illegal exclusions, overcrowding, toyi-toying outside schools that had locked their gates because they were full, non-arrival of teachers (and so no teaching on the first day), pupils left stranded because state-subsidised transport had failed to arrive, the absence of stationery and textbooks ... The dismal list has been very long. Last week (in the inland provinces) and this week (in the coastal provinces), all these problems recurred -- a few reports of schools illegally withholding report cards because of non-payment of fees, a few reports of overcrowding, and so on. But in each case, the key word is “few”. Teacher unions and other organisations monitoring the situation on the ground all agree that the scale of such problems has been vastly reduced. For this, government pressure from the top must take great credit. Minister of Education Naledi Pandor’s predecessor, Kader Asmal, after surveying the chaos he had inherited, started the practice of first-day ministerial visits to schools. The symbolism of this was -- and is -- important: the entire system, down through provincial departments to districts and finally schools themselves, felt itself under intense scrutiny. And the results are at last showing, giving the start of the school year a healthy momentum we have not seen before. Some extremely significant indicators are still to come, though -- for example, how many pupils have not yet been placed in schools, precisely where and to what extent overcrowded classrooms are hindering teaching and learning, where are transport problems occurring and how many pupils are affected. And quite what is going on in the Eastern Cape needs urgent clarification. So a final assessment of exactly how well the reopening has proceeded must wait. Now enormous challenges lie ahead. One involves the much-vaunted no-fee schools: when, if and how many will be implemented this year remain open questions. And another centres on the introduction of the new curriculum in grade 10 this year -- there are already complaints from teachers about inadequate training and non-arrival of textbooks. For now, congratulations are in order. And we hope the momentum already ignited will surge through the whole school year.
sosso82 Posté(e) 20 juin 2006 Posté(e) 20 juin 2006 cec3, es tu tombée sur le même sujet (liberia) ? je suis tombée sur un texte sur les jeux olympiques de turin, plus précisément sur les manifestations des anarchistes par rapport au symbole de la torche; ce texte était tiré de the independent daté du début de l'année; peut pas trop en dire plus faut que je retourne bosser l'oral pro pour demain mais peut être qu'il est possible de trouver le texte sur internet, je ne sais pas. bon courage Est-ce que c'est celui-là? Published on Wednesday, January 25, 2006 by the Independent / UK Olympic Flame Hijacked by Anti-Capitalist Protesters by John Phillips Italian demonstrators have hijacked the Olympic torch on its way to the Winter Games in Turin in unprecedented protests targeting the event's sponsors, Coca-Cola. Eleanora Berlanda, the Italian 1,500 metres champion runner, was pounding the streets of the northern city of Trent bearing the torch when eight protesters, their faces hidden by scarves, burst through barriers along her route and grabbed at it. Ms Berlanda tried to fend them off, but was soon overwhelmed and gave up. Four of her attackers seized the torch and held it aloft. Police intervened and the flame was handed back to the runner, who continued on her way to Turin's ski slopes. The flame is due in Turin on 9 February for the Games, which run from 10-26 February. Four of the protesters escaped, but the other four were arrested and taken to a local police station, where an angry group of anarchists gathered outside in solidarity. The anarchists were booed and jeered by the crowd who had gathered to watch the progress of the flame. Some bystanders shouted "buffoni, buffoni," (buffoons) as the anarchists were led away. "How sad, how it makes me angry too," said Ms Berlanda. "The torch is a symbol of universal peace. It never entered my head that anyone would think of offending it." Valentino Castellani, president of the Turin Olympic Committee (Toroc), called Monday night's incident an "indescribable attack". To avoid further protests, the Games supervisor, Mario Pescante, and the Mayor of Turin, Sergio Chiamparino, have asked Toroc to change the route of the flame over the coming days to bypass the village of Bussoleno in the lower Susa Valley, the heartland of a movement which is protesting against a high-speed railway. The torch has been involved in 33 incidents staged by anarchists and anti-globalisation activists since it left Rome on 8 December on its way to Turin. The radical Mayor of Bussoleno has upset Olympics organisers by banning advertisements within his village for Coca-Cola, an official Olympics sponsor, seen as a symbol of the consumer culture threatening the Alpine Susa Valley. Scores of protesters have lain down in front of lorries carrying Coca-Cola to the Olympics site, drawing a strong reaction from the government. "It is unacceptable that a mayor wearing an Italian tricolour sash does not want to let the torch pass according to the foreseen procedures," said Italy's Ministry for Sport. "We will take the flame where it is welcome. Many people, the great majority, do want to see it." The protests have gathered momentum thanks to a campaign in the lower Susa Valley against a high-speed rail link through the Alps. The incident with the torch happened as anti-globalisation demonstrators gathered in Trent for the most recent of several rallies they have called against the preparations for the February games. They are opposed to the construction of a tunnel through mountains in the Susa Valley as part of plans to build a high-speed rail link between Turin and Lyon. Mass demonstrations in the valley in December forced the government to re-examine the scheme. But hardline groups are keeping up the pressure on the government to abandon the project completely. A short-time before Monday's incident the Italian Interior Minister, Giuseppe Pisanu, condemned the protests against the Olympic flame as "in bad taste". He called on the rail demonstrators "to isolate the extremist anarcho-insurrectionalists" who he said had infiltrated their campaign. Police sources said the extremist groups have been under surveillance. Mr Pisanu said he was not so much worried about terrorist attacks but that there could be "illegal actions at a low-level of violence that nevertheless create great disturbance". © 2006 Independent News and Media Limited ###
Messages recommandés